games for a change, too?

There seems little genuinely exciting at the games front, currently. Recently I have been testing out mainly Xbox games (with an idea that the fixed system might offer starting points for game studies use, too), but not really so much has come across my path that would seem to have lasting value. There were in an Official Xbox Magazine cover disc (#40) these samples: Unreal Championship 2: The Liandri Conflict (Xbox Live multiplayer mayhem), Tom Clancy’s Splinter Cell Chaos Theory (this actually appeared rather interesting spy-action, but I got stuck to the seashore), Area 51 (were they serious? no…), TimeSplitters: Future Perfect (actually I did find this rather fun, even if the in-out-phasing alien FPS does not deliver so much originality after a while), Constantine (I love demonic gothic, cannot help it, but the screen was too dark to play-test this during daylight hours), SNK Vs Capcom: SVC Chaos (oh boy does this arcade translation seem old – nostalgia value for some, no doubt), Tak 2: The Staff of Dreams (the colourful graphics really made you want to explore the world, but the little gaming skills I have are from mouse & keyboard era, kids’ games are just too damned hard) and Star Wars: Republic Commando (original Halo somehow succeeded in making Sci-Fi action more interesting). After some hours with these, I was left with lots of pretty images, but feeling that I have seen these games, albeit in slightly different guises, many times before.

Actually, some of the Nintendo DS games might be offering fresh touches: I am looking forward to at least the DS version of Animal Crossing and “NintenDogs”, whatever will finally come out of it.

Took a nice walk in the sun during Sunday afternoon; then went for dip into avanto (hole in the ice) at the Kauppi winterswimmers’ sauna. Took also some pictures, but the limitations of Ixus are more clear than ever, as compared to the cameras and lenses I have been considering lately. Doh.

camera comparison aches

In Saturday I took a quick check-out of the Canon EOS 350D in a local warehouse in order to get a better idea of how it actually feels and behaves. And to check that my old EF lenses work with it. Oh damn. The first I tested was my old Tokina AF tele-zoom, and then it happened: the lens jammed. It just did not get off from the 350D body! There were several of the shop personnel trying their best, but it started to look like they would break it, so I agreed to leave my lens there. Lets see; they promised to contact a Canon service, and I have their phone number.

The incident really got me rethinking about the whole deal; if my old lenses do not work, I might as well got something different than the EOS. So this weekend I have spend way too much time looking at several sites and hunting for more information particularly on Nikon D70, which couple of people I know own and are happy with. For more, read Phil Askey’s review: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond70/

The comparisons are really interesting, and when put to side-to-side, with real money involved, this is not an easy decision:

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_post.asp?method=sidebyside&cameras=canon_eos350d%2Cnikon_d70&show=all
http://www.digitalreview.ca/cams/NikonD70versusRebelXT.shtml

There are many differences, but both are clearly good cameras, so it really comes down to the possible future uses. Whether to emphasise the light weight (Canon), or more extensive range of functions (Nikon)? The decision of which lens(es) to take adds even more elements into the equation. Created an Excel sheet already to keep track of the options, oh dear…