“Erään harrastuksen kehityskaarta”

Kävin sadepäivän hupina vanhoja valokuvia lävitse, ja oli jännä havaita jo tiettyä kehityskaarta omassa luonto- ja lintukuvauksessa. Katsoin että 2019 kuvasin vielä lähinnä maisemia, perheen matkakuvia ja jonkin verran esimerkiksi hyönteisiä makrokuvina, sekä jonkin verran “taidekuvatyyppisesti” mustavalkokuvia. Esimerkiksi DiGRA 2019 Kioton konferenssin yhteydessä historiallisissa japanilaisissa palatseissa, puistoissa ja vanhan kaupunkin kujilla otetuista kuvista osa näyttää edelleen ihan tyylikkäiltä. Käyttössä oli ensimmäinen peilitön järjestelmäkamerani, kompakti Canon EOS M50 ja siinä muutamia M-sarjan prime- ja zoom-linssejä, joiden lisäksi olin kuvannut vanhemmalla Tamronin telezoomilla, sovittimen avulla.

Vuonna 2020 luontokuvaus alkoi tulla entistä keskeisempään rooliin. Joululahjaksi hommattu Sigman 150-600 mm telezoom alkoi olla aktiivisemmin lintukuvaus- ja hyönteiskuvauskäytössä, mutta raskasta ja hitaasti tarkentavaa linssiä oli vähän kömpelö pyöritellä nopeissa tilanteissa. Olin loppuvuodesta kuitenkin saanut esimerkiksi ensimmäiset kuvani nopeasti kuusen suojissa hyppivästä hippiäisestä, minkä muistan olleen suuren ilon aiheen. Loppuvuodesta 2020 lintukuvaaminen alkaa muuttua systemaattisemmaksi, ja käyn erilaisissa paikoissa kokeilemassa kuvaamista esimerkiksi aamunkoitossa, ja iltavalossa, auringonlaskun aikaan.

Vuosi 2021 toi koronan ja masentavan maailmantilanteen keskellä luonnossa liikkuminen ja valokuvausharrastus toimi henkireikänä – johon aktiivinen keskittyminen lintukuvaukseen toi roimasti lisähaastetta ja tavoitteellisuutta. Järjestän jokaisen järjestelmäkameran kanssa tehdyn kuvausretken kuvat arkistossa omaan kansioonsa, ja kun aiempina vuosina näitä kansioita on ollut noin 150-200 kuvauspäivältä, olin vuodelta 2021 tallentanut 437 kuvausretken tai -tilanteen kuvatiedostoja eri kansioihinsa. Vaikka ihan joka päivä ei oltu ulkona kuvaamassa, niin melkein – ja useilta päiviltä oli pari kuvasarjaa, toinen aamulta ja toinen illalta. Heinäkuun alussa 2021 tein myös (itselleni) ison investoinnin ja ostin Canonin uuden peilittömän “lippulaivakameran”, EOS R5:n. Kuvatiedostojen koko, tarkkuus, kennon dynamiikka (kyky tallentaa sekä tummia että vaaleita sävyjä) että tarkennus- ja kuvausnopeus nousivat periaatteessa aivan uudelle tasolle. Valitettavasti rahat eivät kuitenkaan riittäneet uuteen linssiin, joten jatkoin kuvaamista Sigman 150-600mm:llä, joka uuteen kameraankin liitettynä välillä tarkensi kohteeseen, usein ei. Sitkeä yrittäminen alkoi kuitenkin tuottaa tulosta, ja varsinkin lajikirjo vuoden 2021 aikana laajeni huimasti. Heinäkuussa 2021 sarvipöllö lenteli iltaisin matalalentoa auringonlaskun jälkeen Iidesjärven taimistolla, ja totesin, että vaikka sain jonkinlaisia kuvia, että taidot ja optiikan rahkeet loppuivat liikkuvan linnun yökuvauksessa kesken. Opiskelin lisää, kirjasin kaikki kuvaamani lajit omaan taulukkoonsa, ja hankin sekä lintuoppaita että luontovalokuvausta käsittelevää kirjallisuutta. Loppuvuodesta taulukossa oli 135 eri kuvattua lintulajia, monet itselleni tässä vaiheessa täysin uusia tuttavuuksia. Elämään oli tullut uutta sisältöä.

Vuonna 2022 kuvasin myös paljon, mutta en enää aivan samalla tahdilla (328 eri kuvausretkeä/kansiota). Vuodessa oli monenlaisia huippukohtia sekä lintu-, luonto- että valokuvaharrastuksen kannalta. Suunnittelin kuvaustilanteita paremmin ja sain aiempaa paljon näyttävämpiä kuvia esimerkiksi ohi lentävistä merikotkista. Elokuussa 2022 oli suuri punajalkahaukkojen vaellus, ja hitaammallakin linssillä sai tarkkoja kuvia sähköjohdoilla päivystävistä nuorista haukoista. Näiden haukkojen perässä tuli ajettua autolla Vesilahdelle, harvinaisia kattohaikaroita kävin kuvaamassa muistaakseni Hämeenkyrössä, ja suoranaista harvinaisuuksien perässä ryntäilyä alkoi olla vuoden aikana yhä enemmän. Muistan kuinka ajelin kovaa kyytiä pikkuteitä kuvaamaan jossain Sastamalassa maaliskuussa havaittua harvinaista mustapäätaskua. Vuoden lopussa aiempaa tarkempi havaintotaulukkoni sisälsi 155 eri kuvattua lintulajia. Olin myös saanut sen verran säästettyä, että ostin Canonin L-sarjan parhaan telezoom-linssin, RF 100-500 mm:n, jolla pieniin ja nopeisiin kohteisiin tarkentaminen muuttui paljon entistä helpommaksi. En kuitenkaan ollut aivan tyytyväinen harrastuksen kehityssuuntaan: harvinaisuuksien perässä kaahaaminen ja suurissa kuvaajajoukoissa päivystäminen alkoi tuntua väärältä. Muuramessa joulukuussa havaittu (ja lopulta nääntynyt) tunturipöllö herätti myös monenlaisia ajatuksia, vaikka itse en tätä kaunista ja harvinaista, arktista petolintua käynytkään kuvaamassa. Linnun menehtyminenhän ei lopulta, tutkimuksen mukaan ollut bongareiden ja kuvaajien syytä (lintu oli pahasti nälkiintynyt ja sillä oli loisia), mutta varsinkin bongarityylinen “pinnojen” kerääminen alkoi tuntua itselleni väärältä tieltä.

Vuonna 2023 olen kuvannut ehkä suunnilleen samaan tahtiin kuin edellisenä vuonna, mutta olen jättänyt tietoisesti useampia lähiseuduillakin bongattuja harvinaisuuksia väliin. Mielellään suuntaan jonnekin missä on hiljaista ja missä voi joko kohdata spontaanisti jotain yllättävää, tai vain kävellä metsissä, peltojen tai vesistöjen varsilla nauttien luonnosta. Jotain aiempaa kunnianhimoisempia luontokuvausvirityksiä olen vuoden aikana kokeillut – hommasin naamiopuvun ja päivystin pöllöreviirillä kesäillassa (sarvipöllö ei tuolloin näyttäytynyt). Jotain kauniita kuvia on syntynyt niin, että on systemaattisesti suunnitellut kuvaustilanteen, sijoittunut valon ja kohteen kannalta optimaaliseen paikkaan ja esimerkiksi maannut vesistön rannassa tyylikästä matalaa kuvauskulmaa varten. Päätin kuitenkin tämän vuoden aikana, että en lähde tavoittelemaan “ammattilaistason” luonto- tai lintukuvausta. Kyse on pääosin ajankäytöstä: intohimoinen ja kunnianhimoinen harrastaja voi panostaa huippukuvaan paljon enemmän kuin mihin itse olen valmis. Myös seuraava askel valokuvauslaitteistossa olisi selvästi jo siellä noin 10 000 euron hintaluokassa (pelkkä linssi), mikä ei itselleni tunnu mielekkäältä investoinnilta. Ykköstavoitteena on tällä hetkellä pitää luonto- ja lintukuvaus ilon puolella – kuvata vähemmän tavoitteellisesti ja systemaattisesti, ja nauttia luonnosta sekä jostain onnistumisista mitä lintuhavaintojen ja luontokuvauksen taiteellisenkin puolen osalta aina aika ajoin kohdalle sattuu. Mutta ilman sen suurempaa stressiä, toivottavasti ainakaan.

Ohessa on diaesitys-tyyppinen video tämän kesän omista kuvasuosikeista – varoituksena, että tässä on ryöstökäytetty Vivaldin “Neljää vuodenaikaa (Kesä)” (kaksi kertaa!) ja klippi kestää yli 7 minuuttia. Mutta: jos etenkin lintukuvat kiinnostavat, niin olkaa hyvät!

PS. Tuli edellistä kirjoittaessa lopussa sen verran kiire, että jäi kommentoimatta DiGRA 2023 Sevillan konferenssin yhteydessä saamani tilaisuus nähdä vilauksia eteläisen Euroopan lintumaailmasta paikallisessa kaupunkipuistossa. Tämä on ollut epäilemättä yksi tähänastisen harrastuksen huippukohdista – mutta samalla on pistänyt miettimään eksoottisten lintujen elämysarvoa, vs. esimerkiksi kuvaustaitojen kehittymisestä tai luonnontuntemuksen lisääntymisestä kumpuavaa mielihyvää. Toisaalta on jäänyt sellainen tunne, että jos vain jokin suht’ järkevä matkakuvio luontokuvaukseenkin liittyen on mahdollista järjestellä, niin sellaiseen mielellään tarttuisin myös tulevaisuudessa. Toisaalta suihkukoneella lentely jonnekin Panaman lintuparatiiseihin ei taida ainakaan tällä hetkellä olla minua varten (useammastakin syystä). Mutta: katsotaan minne maailma ja kamera vie! Viime viikkoina olen kyllä löytänyt itseni esimerkiksi Pohtiolammen sääksikeskuksen tornista kuvauskojusta, että toisaalta pötköttelemästä hirvikärpäsiä kuhisevalla sammaleella, syyssoidinta vihelteleviä pyykukkoja tiirailemassa. Parin tunnin kuvausretken voi näemmä useimpina päivinä aika kivuttomasti mahduttaa muun elämän keskelle – mutta neljän tunnin rupeama ilman ennakoivia järjestelyjä alkaa jo tuottaa muillekin ihmisille ongelmia päiväjärjestykseen.

Four camera-lens options for bird photography (Canon, Spring 2023)

No-one asked for this, but I will provide some bird/wildlife photography gear suggestions below, anyways. This is only focused on the Canon options, because that is where I have my personal experience. (Canon is the leading camera manufacturer, but many other probably have somewhat similar options.) The use-case and price are major factors, so I have estimated those (quoted prices are something that I could find currently here in Finland). Any comments are welcome! 😊

Beginner / occasional nature photographer’s suggested option:

  • Canon EOS R50 / M50 Mark II & Sigma 150-600mm f/5-6,3 DG OS HSM Contemporary
  • Price: 1748 euros = 669 euros (M50m2) + 1079 euros (Sigma150-600) (Note: the new R50 will be priced here at c. 879 euros)
  • Pros: over 24 megapixels, APS-C (with 1.6x crop) brings wildlife closer; Dual Pixel autofocus is generally good and pretty fast. Simple and easy to use.
  • Cons: these entry-level cameras are pretty small, ergonomics is not good, there is no wheel or joystick control, one must use the touch screen to move fast the AF area while taking photos; the Sigma lens provides good reach (225-960mm in full-frame terms), but it needs an EF-adapter, and it is slower and more uncertain to focus than a true, modern Canon RF-mount lens. And frankly, these cameras are optimized for taking photos of people rather than birds or wildlife, but they can be stretched for it, too. (This is where I started when I moved from more general photography to bird-focused nature photography, three years ago.)

Travelling, and weekend nature photographer’s suggested option:

  • Canon EOS R7 & RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM
  • Price: 2448 euros = 1699 euros (R7) + 749 euros (RF100-400)
  • Pros: R7 is a very lightweight, yet capable camera – it has 33-megapixel APS-C sensor, the new Digic X processor, a blazingly fast 30 fps electronic shutter, two SDXC UHS-II card slots, IBIS (image stabilization), Dual Pixel AF II with animal eye-focus, and even some weather sealing.
  • Cons: the 651 AF focus points is good, but not pro-level; the camera will every now and then fail to lock focus. The sensor read speed is slow, leading to noticeable “rolling shutter” distortion effects, relating to camera movement during shooting. One needs to shoot more frames, to get some that are distortion-free. There is also only one control wheel, set in “non-standard” position around the joystick. RF100-400 lens is a really nice “walkaround lens” for R7 (it is 160-640mm in full-frame terms). But if the reach is the key priority rather than mobility, then one could consider a heavier option, like the Sigma 150-600mm above.

Enthusiast / advanced hobbyist option:

  • Canon EOS R5 & RF 100-500mm f/4.5-7.1 L IS USM
  • Price: 6939 euros = 3700 euros (R5, a campaign price right now) + 3239 euros (RF100-500)
  • Pros: R5 is already a more pro-level tool; it is weather sealed, has a 45-megapixel sensor, Digic X, 20 fps, IBIS, animal eye-focus with 5940 focus points, dual slots (CFexpress Type B, & SD/SDHC/SDXC), etc.
  • Cons: this combination is much heavier to carry around than the above, R7 one (738+1365g vs. 612+635g). There will probably be a “Mark II” of R5 coming within a year or so (the AF system and some features are already “old generation” as compared to R3 / R7). The combination of full-frame sensor and max 500mm focal length means that far-away targets will be rather small in the viewfinder; the 45-megapixel sensor will provide considerable room for cropping in editing, though.

Working professional / bathing-in-money option:

  • Canon EOS R3 & RF 600mm F4 L IS USM
  • Price: 19990 euros = 5990 euros (R3) + 14000 euros (RF600)
  • Pros: new generation back-illuminated, stacked sensor (24 megapixels), max 30 fps, max ISO 204800, Digic X, new generation eye-controlled AF, enhanced subject tracking, 4779 selectable AF points, etc.
  • Cons: R3 is the current “flagship” of Canon mirrorless systems, but in terms of pixel count, it is behind R5. Some professionals prefer the speed and more advanced autofocus system of R3, while some use R5 because it allows more sharp pixels / room for cropping in the editing phase. The key element here is the (monstrously sized) professional 600mm f/4 prime lens. The image quality and subject separation is beyond anything that the more reasonably priced lenses can offer. The downside is that these kinds of lenses are huge, require mounting them on a tripod pretty much always when you shoot, and the price, of course, puts these out of question for most amateur nature photographers. (Note: as a colleague commented, these large lenses can also be found used sometimes, for much cheaper, if one is lucky.)

And there are, of course, ways of mixing and combining cameras and lenses in many other ways, too, but these are what I consider notable options that differ clearly in terms of use-case (and pricing).

(Photo credit: Canon / EOS Magazine.)

Use of Flash and the Ethics of Nature Photography

A collage of my bird photos from 2022 – for more, see: https://frans.photo.blog/2022/12/27/selected-photos-from-2022-may-december/

I have been experimenting with ”Taavi Tunturipöllö” (the Snowy Owl toy that Santa brought me) by using a low-powered flash to create more illumination into nature photos taken during the dark winter’s days.

”Taavi Tunturipöllö”
(a toy photo outdoors experiment, using a remotely triggered flash).

Generally, I almost never use flash, as I think that the strong flash light makes photos look artificial, dull and uninteresting, I love the tones of natural light, and I also do not want to disturb the birds and animals that I photograph. However, it can be very dark for really long time over here, and I have found out that there are actually many different ways of using additional light sources — and there even seems to be a sort of “ethics of flash photography” scene that I was not previously aware of.

Today’s cameras are already very good in low light, and there are also now long-range wireless transmitters that allow one to position several relatively weak-powered flashes into the planned scene in advance, thereby creating more natural looking and also non-invasive ambient lighting, rather than suddenly just pointing a harsh flashlight directly at the poor subject. (One can try pointing flash into one’s own eyes to experience how that feels.)

Pointing a powerful flash directly to the eyes and face of a night-hunting predator like an owl can blind the animal for maybe even 5-20 minutes, and make it unable to get food – or even make it fly blinded against some obstacle and get injured or killed.

On the other end of flash-ethics, taking photos that use low-powered flash as a source of fill-in light during the daylight hours seems to be safe – it is just harmless flicker to them, ignored by most birds and animals. Even then, a flash positioned too close can create a sudden fright reaction in sensitive birds and animals.

It should be noted that the presence of photographer already might be the disturbing element to the animal, and the negative effects of a flash are secondary. And this is not even getting into the ethics of other techniques some photographers use, such as using taped bird-song as a lure (which can deplete the bird of energy as it reacts to an “intruder”), shouting or throwing objects at animals to get an eye contact from them (yes, indeed some idiot “photographers” apparently behave like that) or even hunting and chasing sensitive animals with photography drones to get “cool” footage.

Let’s not be that guy.

I will continue doing a bit of research on this topic, collecting some useful resources and links below. If you have some good sources to suggest, please comment below, or send me a line.

I made already one cautious experiment (photo below) where I used a remotely triggered flash in the dark while photographing this Great spotted woodpecker that was visiting a forest-located bird feeding site. In this case at least the woodpecker seemed to ignore the light and returned to the feeding site multiple times regardless of me taking photos. But this required me staying in place for more than an hour in the snow, immobile, so that the bird gradually started to trust that I was (mostly) harmless and that it could come close to me. Note, that there were other feeders also available to it that were not this close, but it chose this one.

Great spotted woodpecker (Dendrocopos major, ’käpytikka’; photographed in late evening in a forest feeding site using remote flash as additional light; the bird showed no signs of reacting to the disturbance and continued to feed.)

References:

”Audubon’s Guide to Ethical Bird Photography and Videography” (Aubudon started their nature and bird conservation activities already in 1896; this guide provides both general guidelines for ethical behaviour while taking nature photos, and information about bird specific situations that require special care):

”How to Be an Ethical Wildlife Photographer” (this guide, published by Amateur Photographer magazine, is a synthesis created by Peter Dench of several existing earlier guides; he points out that while not every photographer can be expected to be a biologist/zoologist, but everyone has the ”duty of care”):

”The Ethics of Wildlife Photography” (this article, written by Jill Waterman and published by B&H, a big photography gear company, highlights that while nature photography is born from love of nature, it is today so popular and increasingly invasive, even business-like activity that it has also dark aspects and bad practices that it is important to be aware of, while promoting the non-harmful and less stressful alternative approaches):

”How to photograph wildlife ethically” (National Geographic is a leading journal of photojournalism and high quality nature photography; this guide, authored by Melissa Groo, discusses the key ethics principles while also highlighing problematic practices, and, e.g., is advising to always ”caption one’s photographs with honesty”, meaning that we openly disclose the techniques we have used to capture that image):

”Does Flash Photography Harm Animals?” (Authored by photographer Will Nicholls, this article tries to discuss few available studies on the effects of flash light – noting that this is a controversial area and that different species appear to have very different sensitivities):

”Is Flash Photography Safe for Owls?” (This article, written by Sharon Guynup and published by Aubudon Society, notes the lack of scientific research on the topic of flash effects, but notes that bright light can lead into temporary ”flash blindness” which can be dangerous to owls and other noctural birds, and flash can also startle or wake sleeping owls, disturbing their rest and daily rhythms – there are just many reasons to avoid using flash photography techniques on owls):

See also:

North American Nature Photography Association NANPA ”Principles of Ethical Field Practices”:

Suomen Luonnonvalokuvaajat ry. ”Eettiset periaatteet”:

Birdlife Suomi ry. ”Havainnoi huomaavaisesti”:

-Any other good sources to add into this list? (Thanks to all experts and colleagues who have contributed and/or commented on this piece!)

The return of the culture of blogging?

Monique Judge writes in The Verge about the need to start blogging again, and go back to the ”Web 1.0 era”. My new year’s resolution might be to write at least a bit more into this, my main site (www.fransmayra.fi) and also publish my photos more in my photo blog site (https://frans.photo.blog), rather than just sharing everything into the daily social media feeds. For me, the main positive might be getting a better focus, concentration of the longer form, and also gaining better sense of ”ownership” by having my content on my own site (rather than just everything vanishing somewhere into the deep data mines of Meta/Facebook/Instagram).

The downside is that the culture of Old Internet is there no longer, and almost no-one subscribes to blogs and follows them. Well, at least there will be more peace and quiet, then. Or, will the rise of Fediverse bring along also some kind of renaissance of independent publishing platforms?

https://www.theverge.com/23513418/bring-back-personal-blogging

End of year blog note 2022

There have been many nice things in this year, 2022, even though it feels that it has run really fast. Our Centre of Excellence in Game Culture Studies was operating in full speed, featuring great events like the GameBooks, the game studies spring seminar 2022. The mid-point evaluation of the CoE took place after the fourth year, and we prepared for it carefully. The efforts were rewarded, and the Academy of Finland international review panel gave us outstanding marks on the quality, impact and exceptional scope of our operations. We were awarded with funding for the latter CoE period with glowing marks.

Another big reason for party was that 2022 was also the 20th Anniversary of our Game Research Lab. We started in 2022 when we both initiated a bunch of important game research projects, publications, and also organised the Computer Games and Digital Cultures (CGDC 2002) conference. This was also where I advertised the initiative to establish DiGRA, Digital Games Research Association, which was officially added into the Registry of Associations in 2003 – another reason to have a 20th Anniversary!

Personally, I have continued to be engaged as the professor in the master’s degree program of Game Studies as well as in our doctoral program. I have also continued to work in the editorial board of Pelitutkimuksen vuosikirja (the Finnish Yearbook of Game Studies, the only peer-evaluated publication dedicated to games research in Finnish language). I published a historical and discipline-analytical article about “Game Studies” in the Encyclopedia of Ludic Terms, and also collaborated with Jani Kinnunen and the research assistant Milla Tuomela on the eight Pelaajabarometri (the Finnish Player Barometer survey 2022). There were many people who completed their PhD in game studies, and you can read six “lectios” (public doctoral defence talks) from the Yearbook of Game Studies alone (by Usva Friman, Tero Karttula, Jani Kinnunen, Heidi Rautalahti, Matilda Ståhl and Maria Ruotsalainen). Congratulations to all new doctors!

In even more personal note, I moved to use Apple’s Mac computers as my primary work and personal tools this year, after decades of mostly Windows PC usage. I have been pretty happy with the transition, particularly as the integration with my iPhone and iPad works so well – I have always access to the data and images I need. The user experiences provided by MacOS, iPadOS and iOS are pretty good, the Mac has the best trackpad and gesture control of all computer systems, and iPad Pro has been getting better in multitasking, even if it still has its limitations. But I have not given up other operating systems and hardware ecosystems completely: e.g., this blog post is written under Linux with my HP Elitebook (I just love the typing experience of its keyboard), and in our household, we continue to have several Windows PCs, as the support for gaming is still best in the PC. My family is full with serious gamers (I am the most casual one) and there are multiple things related to graphics cards, operating system updates, various game services, local home networking etc. that I sometimes need to deal with, as the local IT support guy. But I am happy that my family seems to love gaming with Nintendo Switch, as that console needs very little IT support – it just runs fine those Pokémon and Zelda games.

I have also continued my nature and bird photography hobby pretty actively – it provided me with a reason to go out walking and getting some fresh air daily, even if I have scaled down my ambitions with rare species a bit. I noticed that counting the species I had photographed turned the nature and art oriented activity into some kind of competition and gaming exercise. Today, I am happy to try evolving my photography skills with any, even the most common birds, animals, insects and landscapes I encounter and have access to, without extra stress.

There was also the sad day, when we lost Matti, my father, after a long and difficult illness. His funeral was in early December in Helsinki.

By the way, this blog was started in March 2004, and while social media has taken over most of the discussion, sharing and commenting functions already for the past decade at least, I like the leisurely style of reflective writing too much to let this site die. There is still more than a year to the day when I’ll write the 20th Anniversary blog post! (Btw, I needed to get away from the toxic mess that Twitter had become, so I replaced that site with a new profile in the distributed, non-commercial Mastodon network. I also remain pretty active in Facebook, of all places.)

Here are a few photos, at the end of the year – have an excellent New Year 2023!

Nature Photos Update

During the Spring Term of 2022, I have taken (according to my last count) photos of 129 different species of birds. Here is featured a selection, along with some random other samples of my nature photos. Excellent summer, everyone!

Luontokuvat, nature photos 2021

I selected some of my favourite nature photos of 2021 / Alla on valikoima omia suosikkejani luontokuvista vuoden 2021 varrelta.

Happy New Year 2022! / Onnea uudelle vuodelle 2022!

Birds: 99/100

Naturephotography, and bird photography in particular has been an invaluable part of my life during these stressful pandemic times. The constantly changing and surprising nature has been there, at all times, challenging and providing gradually more and more also sense of achievement, as my understanding of both birds and their behaviours as well as of techniques of nature photography have evolved.

Soon after the start of this year I began tracking the species I have photographed more systematically. There is a challenge (supported by BirdLife Finland and other organisations) of trying to observe 100 different bird species during one year. I have followed a version where I also need to take a photo of such new bird species.

If my calculations are correct, I am today at 99 different bird species photographed, out of those 100. Exiting times. I will add below some collages of those 99 bird photos – there are probably some duplicates, as well as some species missing, as I did not make this in very systematic and careful manner. But there were a lot of important moments and happy memories packed in these photos, so it was a delight to go through and revisit them.

Update: I got photo of the species number 100 on the following day
after writing this – Osprey! Photo added as the last one, below!

My bird species number 100, on year 2021! Osprey (Pandion haliaetus).

Life in winter forests

This year, we had a full week of “hiihtoloma” (Winter Vacation) – a very welcome break into the busy schedules. I took the opportunity and challenged myself to go out into the nature and look a bit closer at the nature this week.

Firstly, it was interesting to notice that even the “common birds” can provide new experiences and look indeed very different, depending the time of day, weather conditions and particularly light affecting the composition in different manners. Endless opportunities for improvement and experimentation there.

Secondly, during this week I learned to appreciate the winter feeding of birds better. There are people who dedicate countless hours every winter (and indeed considerable sums of money – which some of them have very little) into e.g. forest feeding of wild birds. For many birds this is the only way they can make it through the hardest, coldest parts of the winter alive.

In winter feeding spots it is possible to take photographs of even some rather rare and elusive bird species, if you are patient, stay still and quiet for long periods of time (sometimes in freezing temperatures) and respect the disturbance-free, peaceful environment that such birds require for getting their daily nourishment. Unfortunately it seems that as nature photography is getting increasinly popular, some rare winter birds (such as herons and kingfishers in Finnish winter) attract so many photographers that the huge interest can even endanger the survival of some of these birds. There are only few hours of light and milder cold time every winter day, and the birds need all that time to find the food they need to make it through the next, very cold night. Note though, that no doubt the majority of experienced nature photographers behave responsibly, respect the safe distances, and keep the well-being of the birds as their top priority.

I did not personally visit any sites of such “super rarities” this winter. There was a lot of interesting things to photograph, even without risking the rare ones.

There are many places in Finland, such as our national parks and many hiking areas that have paths that are accessible also in winter time. And when the crust of snow is hard (“hankikeli” is Finnish), one can rather easily walk over marshland or at lake shores, sometimes spotting interesting bird species, but primarily to enjoy the nature and beatiful winter weather. I also visited e.g. Siuronkoski rapids, where white-throated dipper (Cinclus cinclus; koskikara) lives – there is a popular walking path going just next to the rapids, and the birds are so accustomed to humans moving in the area that it is possible to photograph them without disturbing their feeding.

One delightful theme that appeared this week was encountering woodpeckers. There are nine woodpecker species that one can theoretically see in Finland – though some of them are super rare (like Picus viridis). Visiting local forest paths and some winter feeding spots, I managed to photograph four woodpecker species this week, which really delighted me: Dendrocopos major (Käpytikka), Dendrocopos minor (Pikkutikka), Picus canus (Harmaapäätikka) and Dryocopus martius (Palokärki). Previously I had only met the great spotted woodpecker (Dendrocopos major), so this was three new species for me – in just one week. This proves the value of getting our of one’s common paths and trying exploring some new, also less-visited areas every now and then.

The 2nd of March was a particularly excellent day, as it was rather warm, sunny, and we made a longish trip with the entire family, exploring some Pirkanmaa and Satakunta region nature areas together. There were fields where a number of whooper swans (Cygnus cygnus; Laulujoutsen) had already arrived – a sure sign of Spring! While driving home in the evening, we had another surprise encounter: a white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla; merikotka), accompanied by an inquisitive and plain greedy crow. These eagles are are the biggest birds of prey in Finland, and also the biggest success story of our nature conservation efforts: in 1973, there was only 35 nesting couples in the entire county, and the species was facing extinction due to chemical pesticides and other factors (in the early 20th century, there was even bounty paid for killing the eagles – and negative attitudes towards birds of prey persisted for a long time). WWF Finland volunteers started winter feeding the eagles, carrying clean and safe meat into islets and rocks where birds could find them, for two decades. Today, it is estimated that there are 450 nesting couples living in Finland. One of the main remaining threats is the use of lead birdshots particularly in Åland islands, leading to lead poisoning of eagles eating carcasses. A third of young eagles continue to die of lead poisoning in Finland every year (see https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-7889294).

To sum up this week of nature experiences: there is so much to see, experience, study and learn in nature – both next door, in one’s own yard or city park, or in the surrounding nature areas. One thing that I became also aware, was that I was using our petrol-powered family car to drive into some of these, more far-away nature locations. I have now started planning of upgrading into an electric vehicle (EV) – but more about that perhaps later. Let’s enjoy and study the nature, responsibly!

Winter wildlife

During the long, isolating months of 2020, and at the start of bright new year 2021, wildlife photography has been one of my constant comforts. Like all photography, it challenges one with its surprising combinations of accidental conditions, changes in lightning, and need to attempt pushing the boundaries of technology. When photographing animals, there is the additional challenge of trying to keep cover, stay silent and undisturbing, while simultaneously trying to find the perfect angle of view, and artistic composition to the subject.

I suppose many professional wildlife photographers resort to the use of purpose-built wildlife hides, and some kind of baits to increase the odds of seeing a rare animal in the first place, and then getting it into a position where an impressive composition – with the right light, background, depth of field, etc. – can be achieved. If one is under the pressure to produce results from one’s photography, such approaches obviously make a difference.

As a hobbyist photographer, I am happy to just go out and enjoy the nature. If I’d see wildlife that is a plus, and having some kind of photograph from the encounter is even more special. The common skills of nature photographers are something that I continue to learn, slowly over the years. Moving slowly and quietly – using one’s ears a lot: listening bird sounds, tiny cracks or snaps within the foliage. I have gradually started to realise that moving restlessly from photo position to another will make me less likely to achieve anything, and also lessen the mental effects of nature photography as a sort of ‘zen practice’ towards joy and peace of mind.

It is good to wake up early, make some sandwitches and coffee, and be at an interesting site before the sunrise. The upside of short winter days of the North is that “before the sunrise” can be rather easily achieved, during the winter months.

It is also interesting to learn to read the tracks: combining whatever knowledge one has about the daily and annual rhythms and behavioural patterns of different species can be combined with the signs, footprints and animal tracks that are particularly visible in fresh snow. Seeing the tracks tells stories, and one can learn that at least there are certain species in the area, even if they are too wary to make an appearance.

I think Hannu Hautala, the famous Finnish wildlife photographer veteran had sometimes said that luck favours the hard workers (or something like that). I do not really have time, opportunity or motivation to make long nature photography trips into exotic or spectacular places. I just move around our home and city, sometimes making small hiking trips in the close surrounding forests. And I do not put too many hours into this, and accept that my odds are thus not very high for seeing anything except the most common species of birds and animals that can be met in this area. But it is fascinating regardless to see what one is able to make out of those rather modest starting points.

Today I met an energetic, furry fox hunting for bank voles during my morning photo walk. It was rather dim, it was cloudy, and there was a bit of snowfall. But fresh snow made everything soft and somehow luminous, and I was happy to test using silent shutter and long telephoto (600 mm in crop, equal to 930 mm full frame) not to disturb the fox too much. It could see me, and moved a bit farther away to continue its hunting. There must have been plenty of bank voles; I counted it catching at least three while I was watching.

Another happy encounter in the life of amateur nature photographer. It is moments like these that enrich our lives, and motivate one to find fresh respect for the beauty and diversity of nature.